I can’t back it up with any stats, but even at 30 bucks, the Muse XL blows compared to the onboard realtek sound It’s just not that great really, and I hope you’re just arguing a “Best of the Worst” kind of argument, otherwise if your friend really wants good gaming he should pick up a TBSC instead. Audio software Sound cards Computer-related introductions in May 14, Posts: Both reasons are bogus. Feb 11, Posts: MostlyHarmless Ars Praefectus Registered: The specification covers two types of component, and the “AC-link” digital interface between them:
|Date Added:||8 July 2018|
|File Size:||5.46 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Every frame is subdivided in 13 slots.
Hook something up to your PC to record. IME, I’ve found onboard sound especially HSP to be noisy, though Asus had produced a few boards with turkey C-Media chips; humming and rumbling when you move the mouse.
I wouldn’t trust marketers as a reliable source of technical fact. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Then don’t worry about your friend. Audio software Sound cards Computer-related introductions in I doubt there’s any real difference in audio quality between the realtek and codev cmedia.
Suspicious Activity Detected
I only used it in 2-channel mode, not for gaming. Alternatively, sample rate conversion could be performed in the DC97 controller or in the software driver.
Let him bask in his ignorance. Normally, six channels are used for 5.
Computer motherboards often provide a connector to bring microphone and headphone signals to the computer’s front panel with standard color jack. MostlyHarmless Ars Praefectus Registered: In other projects Wikimedia Commons. Dude, if you’re worried about CPU usage, go and look at the article I linked to. Webarchive template wayback links All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from October Articles with permanently dead external links Commons category link is on Wikidata.
This revision provides means for the audio codec to supply parametric data about its analog interface much like Intel High Definition Audio. AC97 is supported by most operating systems, such as Windows and Linux.
I don’t know how it’ll sound on the onboard, but it can’t be worse than the atrocious distortion, hiss, and high-pitched noise that’s present when you record with the Muse XL. Is the argument now down to just CPU usage? Mar 3, Posts: I can’t back it up with any stats, but even at 30 bucks, the Muse XL blows compared to the onboard realtek sound It’s just not that great really, and I hope you’re just arguing a “Best of the Worst” kind of argument, otherwise if your friend really wants good gaming he should pick up a TBSC instead.
It might just be me though, the Muse sounds a lot clearer and cleaner to me. I don’t know about the MuseXL, but the Cmedia onboard sound on my A7v sounds great to my ears they have the same chipset.
Mon Jul 29, 7: Coeec has had several revisions: This is therefore a time-division multiplexing TDM scheme. Do this for a test: AC’97 defines a high-quality, or bit audio architecture with 5.
AC’97 Audio Codecs (Driver Only) – Download
So unless your friend has a Mhz processor, hardware-based vs. Tue Jul 30, 3: Intel provides a specification for that header; the signal assignments are different for AC’97 and Intel High A,c650 Audio headers. Wikimedia Commons has media related to AC’ You’ll see that even with a Mhz processor, the difference amounts to a few percentage points.